Welcome to WIFI Antennas

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Admin

Administrators
  • Content count

    4636
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Admin

  1. PET is better
  2. PMMA Organic glass (plexiglass), or polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)...??? The dielectric constant of PMMA is around 4.9....very bad
  3. ,,, good, show me such a material in practice ... !!! For the helix antennas does not really matter dielectric material, but I think the best is Teflon , Polystyrene and the Air
  4. The best material for the construction of the antennas is the sheet, thickness of 0.15-0.5mm This is from the sheet of aluminum tin cans boxes
  5. A new form of biquad antenna
  6. Optimization Techniques in CST Studio Suite,,, Optimize in CST.doc
  7. The dual polarized microstrip antenna was design to generate signals with +45 and -45 polarized but with a loss in directivity gain of about 3dBi This antenna is more interesting with symmetrical excitation at a resonant frequency
  8. DELTA antenna, another kind of miniature antenna on PCB for 5.8GHz Anyway it's sub-miniature, about 30x30mm And here are the CSTfile thickness FR4 = 1mm DELTA 5,8GHz.cst
  9. DELTA antenna, another kind of miniature antenna on PCB for 5.8GHz
  10. This is a 1.2GHz antenna version with pseudo-elliptical polarization
  11. ,,,a simple sloted patch antenna for 5,8MHz dimensions = 4,5x45x45mm constructive details on feed point,use this type of connector
  12. I think this type of antenna is better Double plated PCB
  13. I am going to try to do a simulation, it might be that the ellipse has other dimensions for this antenna What thickness of PCB did you choose?
  14. for 1.3GHz it is recommended to use elliptical cut
  15. "And these are the latest results
  16. For this, I have to resume the simulation, this project is old for a few years
  17. You could say it's a new form of the antenna gain in a reasonable direction ...
  18. then multiplies the dimensions of the image with k = 1,0345 for the frequency of 5,8ghz
  19. But biquad2.igs file is for 1.5mm FR4 thickness,,,,!!!!!
  20. Ant_kid, are you interested in antennas for drones?
  21. ... yes. can adjust the impedance or something like that,,,,
  22. the uplink and dowlink it should be roughly the same...