Welcome to WIFI Antennas

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Admin

Administrators
  • Content count

    4763
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Admin

  1. for 1.3GHz it is recommended to use elliptical cut
  2. "And these are the latest results
  3. For this, I have to resume the simulation, this project is old for a few years
  4. You could say it's a new form of the antenna gain in a reasonable direction ...
  5. then multiplies the dimensions of the image with k = 1,0345 for the frequency of 5,8ghz
  6. But biquad2.igs file is for 1.5mm FR4 thickness,,,,!!!!!
  7. Ant_kid, are you interested in antennas for drones?
  8. ... yes. can adjust the impedance or something like that,,,,
  9. the uplink and dowlink it should be roughly the same...
  10. which antenna?
  11. What dimensions did you use for FR4 thick 1mm ,,, ??? I have not posted such dimensions....!!!
  12. ,,,if CP is Circular Polarisation,,,,YES...!!!!
  13. ,,, for 1200MHz,don"t you think that the antenna is too big, about 4,8 times...???
  14. ,,,and here is a patch-yagi antenna made only from tin cans....
  15. this means; the efficiency of an antenna is a ratio of the power delivered to the antenna relative to the power radiated from the antenna. A high efficiency antenna has most of the power present at the antenna's input radiated away. A low efficiency antenna has most of the power absorbed as losses within the antenna, or reflected away due to impedance mismatch. the efficiencies; -radiation efficiencies(magnitude in dB) -total efficiencies(magnitude in dB) -gain(in dBi)
  16. "I do not know exactly, I think 59mm, but the simulation should be done
  17. and here are the results for the frequency band 2500-2620MHz
  18. только для образца .. !!!
  19. круговые диски более эффективны
  20. да, конечно