Welcome to WIFI Antennas

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

clanon

Members
  • Content count

    768
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by clanon

  1. simlations
  2. the diameter would decrease....but to get more than 10 db it should take more than 2 meters....i think...
  3. YUP! i picked stations (VHF TV RADIO) from Chile (1000km or more ) by refraction that way with the helical monster...and some other antennas...with lots of FADING and it doesn't last long... HEIGHT above GROUND is of utmost importance beyond 200kms... PS: it will be useful to know the POLARIZATION on the TX...
  4. You SHOULD PLAY with the reflector distances around 2 centimetres (19 mm right now) , more or less some millimetres (to allow for PCB differences in material) Closer more gain and vswr ...farther less vswr and gain (there MUST be a SWEET SPOT there) THIS is for FR4 4.3 dielectric constant (permeability) 1 millimetre (thickness) or less Quad .dxf Quad gerber file.gbr quad.cst
  5. working on the RHOMBOID right now...hard to DRAW that shit...
  6. you didn't answer about material availability...sizes...
  7. This should work UKW 14 Elemente, DDR-Ausführung.maa
  8. the CODE was on site UKW 14 Elemente, DDR-Ausführung.maa.txt i'm gonna work on the RHOMBIC...27dbi , more on my alley for dx...
  9. I always wanted to try a crossed dipoles (circular-elliptical) polarized array... Most of the signals are Vertical on old equipment (around here) and quasi CP on the new stations...theory
  10. Other FM mmana files (german) we could try something .."new" ..what tubes are you planning to use... and boom dimensions... hard to get close to 14-15 dbi without a big area reflector...
  11. nice...I did some 400km 500km dx back in the 90's ...but i have a cement glass fiber roof W (dielectric until rain) over which i put 2 x 30 mts helical wire , feed at the middle with 300 ohms cable over or close to 15 dbi i guess...to mi advantage the roof was aligned with the big cities... stations piled up and kick each other out...(yamaha fm receiver good selectivity and sensitivity)
  12. Reception...? UNIdireccional Omnidirectional indoors outdoors...?
  13. JOMY...! HOW do i LOWER the VSWR... antenna is GREAT but too INDUCTIVE REACTIVE... too NARROW BAND... distance to reflector change NO GOOD distance to feed network NO GOOD
  14. NON PERIODIC ( non resonant ) CABLE lengths shouldn't be a problem (only for signal loss , bad connectors, too long , bad quality losses) it's just an interaction between the VNA hardware and the cable...i think... CORRECT ME if i'm wrong.
  15. if I build it (which i WON't) I would pass the cable STRAIGHT ( NO angles ) from the reflector's CENTER and solder it from BEHIND...(but that's just me) need to simulate to confirm...Like i did on the parabolic feed...of course you need to fix the reflector without the bolt in the middle or make it HOLLOW
  16. send ONE bitcoin my way...and we're EVEN! HOPE you BUILD it and tell how it goes!
  17. He's VERY limited in Theory and Software... It seems like he's always GUESSING with some things he REALLY know (from experience) the guy is old school...see his EQUIPMENT... In the Comments , he's always being CORRECTED... I asked him SEVERAL times about the IONNICA...(avoided me always) Knowledge is HARD...you must be flexible and keep at it...there's ALWAYS something NEW
  18. can't you install wifiinfoview or any other software in the client hardware...and look back at the 722...?
  19. not is NOT the best design for less than 15dbi.... There's hundred or thousand designs for 15dbi or more (in this iste even) EASIER to MAKE With the 722 i use ONLY METAL antennas...dielectrics SUCK the juice of the signals... PS:The BIG change in VSWR is not a real life issue...is a SOFTWARE setting , intersections, port, or other...(can't change THAT much for 0.01 or 0.02)
  20. i'll check and confirm All this for FR4 1mm PCB
  21. AHHH! you mean BlueTooth 2400 to 2483.5 (center at 2441.75 and 83.5mhz of bandwidth) YES it's NOT hard once you decide materials and performance...