Welcome to WIFI Antennas

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

clanon

Members
  • Content count

    768
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by clanon

  1. Theoretically 9dbi MAX 1 Patch , 12dbi MAX 2 Patchs , 15dbi 4 Patchs , 8 patchs should give 18dbi but you need DISTANCE area ,(then box shape and volume and reflectors directors (more volume) on 24 x 20 x 5mm (with PES) foam...(even 20 x 18 x 5mm) works LIPTON Panel15v4VMod1b...(bigger volume) and weight ...(more SIDELOBES) Marine 4 patchs with director (a pain in the ass to build) ...(more SIDELOBES) haven't seen it... this gets close but bigger area (and some sidelobes) The thing with FA-20 PATCHES is that they get more gain with the FLAPS WINGS...at 30 degrees...(but they are really inductive and we need to correct reactivity Zi) Don't forget is a COVER of a Netbook (Intel clamshell Class PC)
  2. 24 cm x 20 cm REFLECTOR...HUGE difference in GAIN
  3. Any LONGER (more GAIN)antenna (for the Fr of interest , and BW , would get you Longer distances) you should start a Thread on this...(I used to connect two uhf 4w handys close to 20km away) making'em new antennas...
  4. Dragoslav Dobričić is a respetable designer , engineer with several years of experience and BUILDS...check it out (before simulators) AMOS antennas vg https://www.qsl.net/yu1aw/
  5. this one you could try... i'll check the simulations...later on ... fid24ghz.pdf
  6. All of 'em use 5ghz at the same time...dual band...you'll need to modify your antenna https://miloserdov.org/?p=2196 https://www.wifi-antennas.com/topic/52-dual-band-cantenna/#comment-98
  7. IMHO Hacking cards and BROWSING-DOWNLOADING cards...should't be the same... (AR9271 , RTL8187 and RT3070) for the former and some new MIMO for the later...(No need for ALPHAS...)
  8. https://www.dropbox.com/s/wj47zaotgvpyzg6/MONTAJE DE LAS ANTENAS BELGRANO WINDALO.pdf?dl=0
  9. Solver type and settings...? (Time , frecuency...etc)
  10. Jomy , could you save the cst files in an older version...? (old PC , less than 4gb of ram here) I have a parabolic dish ready to test your antenna...trying a regula feed right now
  11. We should adjust it for dielectric PVC for sure (DOME) and test it on a parabolic dish... (PS: i could give it a try if you want..) My CST is 2017...can't open new files...
  12. I'm inclined to at least 1m2 of area and the most "perfect" parabolic or cylindrical curve...possible...(Cylindrical is much easier to get)...but the KEY ..is the feeder efficiency.
  13. the reflector could be something similar to a TL-ANT2424B (tp-link) but about the feeder you gonna have to ask JOMY (admin)
  14. 23dbm (100...150mw MAX) output UPLOAD 104dbm max Sensitivity DOWNLOAD Still it looks like you gonna need a parabolic dish...NOT SMALL with more than 20dbi of gain...perfectly pointed and the modem close to the antenna...which should be on the ROOF...IMHO
  15. https://5g-tools.com/4g-lte-link-budget-calculator/
  16. What STANDARD is this...? LTE , UMTS , or GSM... Sensibility is DIFFERENT on all 3 and WLAN... MAX is UMTS  2100 MHz: -106.7 dBm@3.84 MHz
  17. 20dbm output it seems it would need more than 16dbi...18 or more...IMHO specs.pdf
  18. HI , JOMY...its hidden...4mm Pes ,(1.2 ) I'm using it right now...stable and "discrete"
  19. Changed Gain for stability
  20. yagi

    Conveniently, the dipole parasitic elements have a node (point of zero RF voltage) at their centre, so they can be attached to a conductive metal support at that point without need of insulation, without disturbing their electrical operation The driven element is fed at centre so its two halves must be insulated where the boom supports them.
  21. planning on REBUILD muy FA20 WITHOUT screws to reflector...this patches work better (lower VSWR) floating and NOT grounded! "Years later I had the chance to buy an Agilent Fieldfox Network/Spectrum Analyzer for my job, I quickly measured the VSWR and the result is stunning 1.2 VSRW from channel 1 to 11, it kind of confirm the simulation results https://vswr1.wordpress.com/2011/12/03/fooling-around-with-design-of-the-antenna-fa20/
  22. Doing the fine tunning , now... very happy with the results , stability and Gain...! W7 showing 10 db more than linux on every Ap...(damn drivers for sure)
  23. 15 cms long @ 30 degrees w"wings"...
  24. IF these are ok...is poor ISP service...also try http://Fast.com with all settings on...to compare...