Welcome to WIFI Antennas

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Search the Community: Showing results for tags 'biloop'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Wired Network
    • Ethernet edge
    • Technical wired networks
  • Wireless network
    • Antennas for 2.4 GHz band
    • Antennas 5GHz band
    • Antennas for mobile communications
    • Modeling antennas
    • Modification of Wi-Fi equipment
    • Wi-Fi equipment in the work
    • Wi-Fi Soft
    • WarDriving
    • Brainstorm
  • About Others
    • Smoking Room
    • Buy / Sell / Exchange
    • HF, VHF and UHF

Categories

  • Articles

Calendars

  • Community Calendar

Blogs

There are no results to display.

Categories

  • Files

Found 1 result

  1. I am thinking of using bi-loop instead of biquad, I use matlab on a daily basis, and I have not yet managed to make a model, I am currently unable to check 1) Bi-Loop is mechanically simpler to make, tune and correction. What else, what profit can it give. In publication about this antenna for a 2,45GHz: "The simulation results showed that the best parameters value are 14.95 mm of loops radius, 1.15 mm of links radius, and 15.57 mm of reflector gap. In these parameters, the antenna had a characteristic value of return loss -36.65 dB, bandwidth 354 MHz" IMG_1496.webp