Welcome to WIFI Antennas

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Admin

Antena Air Live WAI-102PA (v2)

61 posts in this topic

Let's make the next copy of the antenna..

WAI102pa.JPG

Caracteristicas: 

Conexion: por cable RG-178 a RP-SMA. 
Frecuencia: 2,4 ~ 2,5 GHz 
Impedancia: 50 ohmios. 
Ganancia: 10 dBi a longitud de cable "0" 
Polarización: Lineal 
Dimensiones: 100 x 65 x 30 mm 
Material: cobre (bronce) de 0,5 mm de espesor.

 

AirLive0.jpg

AirLive1.jpg

AirLive2.jpg

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

,,,only if the reflector is increased to 80X100mm...

fly_01.jpg

fly_02.jpg

fly_03.jpg

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, garry said:

Is this design change acceptable for the 2600 MHz frequency?

Yes, it can ... !!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

About that could be, with the same reflector ...

fly_02.jpg

fly_01.jpg

fly_03.jpg

fly_04.jpg

screenshot_6306.jpg

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was a bit hasty, but the Director can be cut to size in the drawing.

And... that's what happened, the test will come when my 4G modem.

20180926_133614.JPG

20180926_133621.JPG

20180926_133635.JPG

20180926_133650.JPG

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

,,,both the director and the vibrator must be shortened, the height instead of 5mm comes 4.75mm...!!!!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The height of the M6 nut was 5 mm. Wiping it, I achieved the thickness of the nut 4.7 mm, more precisely I can not measure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

,,,it"s okay...!!!

,,,if you make a panel with 4 such antennas, it will be the gain in directivity (15dBi)...!!!

fly_01.jpg

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This design is not difficult to repeat. Method to balance the four elements in future antenna I don't know.

Edited by garry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

""", something like this ,is hard to do ...???

8.jpg

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the matching lines are made of copper wire, it is quite possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the adjustment lines are made of copper wire with a diameter of 1.5 mm,
I will try to make a project with this antenna for you...!!!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, buddy...!!! This project, I think, will be interesting to all users of our forum!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good, it seems that the antenna works very well but I think for reducing the impedance to 50 ohms, it is necessary to modify the diameter of the copper wire

2,6_01.jpg

2,6_02.jpg

2,6_03.jpg

2,6_04.jpg

2,6_05.jpg

2,6_06.jpg

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

,,,and in a 4x4 panel version it looks like this...

17.jpg

MUIE_01.jpg

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

,,, sure, it can ... !!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Our Bejonet user says ...

""hi friend,

i was made it, but still not good, unlucky me  

i dont have any instrument for check if this antenna is working or not, just try to connected to my router and wifi signal is not good..""

52.jpg

 

"and still  I do not understand what the problem is ... !!! ???

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have this design works well. Does the SMA connector match the connector on the router? If so, I don't know what can be changed.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, garry said:

I have this design works well. Does the SMA connector match the connector on the router? If so, I don't know what can be changed.

what material do you use and how thick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the thickness of the material is not that critical. I used galvanized steel with thickness 0.2 mm for the vibrator and the Director, reflector in galvanized steel with thickness of 0.5 mm.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

my mistake have  look at the picture,  nut not to  the center vibrator and director

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now