Antenna for digital TV

[Admin 2545]

,,, and the variant with cut corners...
 

 

Spoiler

 

[Admin 2545]

,,, and a variant proposed by the user "com666"...

 

[Admin 2545]

 I think I should test this mini-TV antenna...!!!

,,.from JM actualidades on YouTube...!!

[clanon 246]

 

Edited July 8, 2020 by clanon

[vova.gumerov 23]

On 15.03.2020 at 13:41, Admin said:

,, по просьбе пользователя" vars-cat "я попытался смоделировать эту антенну с крыльями летучей мыши для полосы частот 470-820 МГц..

 

  Скрыть содержимое

 

 

  Скрыть содержимое

 

Your batwing is good! But I do not have enough sheet Al, can I shift up to 730? Why should I cover the entire range! Sizes will be smaller.

[Edel2020 20]

Greetings group... I was given the schematic of an antenna that they say is the best in Europe at the moment, but I don't know what impedance this type of dipole has and if it will be as good as they say... could it be modeled and find out if it is as good?

[Edel2020 20]

Here you have it...

[Admin 2545]

,,,hello  Edel, a simulation could be made, but there are still some dimensions missing from the vibrator...!!!

,,,also mark the angles of the reflector and the directors' arms...!!!

[Edel2020 20]

Too bad... I owe you this, it's what I have on hand, maybe you want to try other types of vibrators, I've seen this one in similar models

[Edel2020 20]

Ahhh wait I found something....the reflector is in the image 60 degrees and the directors is 6.70 degrees

[Admin 2545]

,,,you can show how the antenna is in real image..!!!

[Edel2020 20]

[Admin 2545]

,,, it can't be better than this, but with the second version of the vibrator...!!!

,,,if you can, give me more constructive details on the first dipole version...!!!

[clanon 246]

ENA-2135-RGB X band.pdf

[Edel2020 20]

Toole ... that's what I have for now, I'll keep looking. The vibrator that sends you as a test is from the Antenna PF5000 and this balum that I had not seen before, but of this if I have no more details

[eco32 27]

On 22.08.2024 at 5:41 AM, Admin said:

,,, it can't be better than this, but with the second version of the vibrator...!!!

,,,if you can, give me more constructive details on the first dipole version...!!!

This is an interesting and surprising design - Tuning directores positions process looks  terrible, so much elements and only 14dBi. @Admin, Your version of the biquaod was better.
Now we know that this is a dead end road and that it doesn't work.

Edited August 27 by eco32

[Admin 2545]

,,,,other construction details...

yagi antenna.pdf

siap print driven double U WD CHANEL.pdf

driven double U.pdf